IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Kreisz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-02 Country: Hungary
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 37 27 20 47 1.270 0.4558 0.4558 — —
2022-23 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 46 30 43 73 1.587 0.5694 0.5694 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 39 6 18 24 0.615
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 38 9 12 21 0.553
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 39 6 19 25 0.641
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2023-24 · Minnesota
+31.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#557
Forward overall
#16
Forward born in 2003
#8
in CAHS-W

D1 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly Pannek
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.