← New Search ↗ Social Card

Meredith Jensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0254 0.0254
2018-19 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0707 0.0707
2019-20 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 23 8 9 17 0.739 0.1187 0.1187
2020-21 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 19 19 9 28 1.474 0.2367 0.2367
2021-22 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 27 25 21 46 1.704 0.2736 0.2736
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SR 31 3 4 7 0.226
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W JR 29 1 3 4 0.138
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SO 30 2 3 5 0.167
2022-23 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W FR 26 0 2 2 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · Dartmouth
-57.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#701
Defenseman overall
#137
Defenseman born in 2004
#439
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.205 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.