IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Cantelon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Etobicoke Dolphins OWHL-U22 28 0 5 5 0.179 0.0624 0.0624 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SR 35 2 5 7 0.200
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SR 35 2 5 7 0.200
2024-25 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA JR 34 2 3 5 0.147
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA JR 34 2 3 5 0.147
2023-24 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SO 30 1 1 2 0.067
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SO 30 1 1 2 0.067
2022-23 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA FR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4399
Defenseman overall
#762
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Abby Ecker
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Niska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Glover
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Abby Ecker
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Niska
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Glover
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.