IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jocelyn Fiala Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1169 0.1169 — —
2021-22 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 28 2 10 12 0.429 0.1002 0.1002 — —
2022-23 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 30 3 23 26 0.867 0.2027 0.2027 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse D1 CHA-W JR 34 0 5 5 0.147
2024-25 Syracuse D1 CHA-W — 35 2 4 6 0.171
2023-24 Syracuse D1 CHA-W — 34 0 2 2 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2023-24 · Syracuse
-61.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1411
Defenseman overall
#214
Defenseman born in 2005
#42
in SFMAAAHL-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hailey Adair
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michaela McNamara
Endicott · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amber Heidenreich
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.