Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Saskatoon Stars | SFMAAAHL-W | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.1169 | 0.1169 |
| 2021-22 | Saskatoon Stars | SFMAAAHL-W | 28 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.429 | 0.1002 | 0.1002 |
| 2022-23 | Saskatoon Stars | SFMAAAHL-W | 30 | 3 | 23 | 26 | 0.867 | 0.2027 | 0.2027 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Syracuse | CHA-W | JR | 34 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.147 |
| 2024-25 | Syracuse | CHA-W | SO | 35 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.171 |
| 2023-24 | Syracuse | CHA-W | FR | 34 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.059 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Bizal | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG | 0.268 | Boston College |
| Dani Sadek | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG | 0.611 | Ohio State |
| Kendra Nealey | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG | 0.212 | Cornell |
| Lauren Kelly | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG | 0.208 | Dartmouth |
| Erin O'Connor | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG | 0.758 | Cornell |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Ballinger | 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG | 0.556 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Taylor Thompson | 2013-14 · 0.67 PPG | 1.185 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Emma Hart | 2021-22 · 0.98 PPG | 0.808 | Alvernia | UCHC |
| Alyson Niebur | 2015-16 · 1.32 PPG | 0.600 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Emilee Anderson | 2016-17 · 1.65 PPG | 0.480 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.