Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Orono High | USHS-MN-W | 20 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0.750 | 0.1132 | 0.1132 |
| 2021-22 | Orono High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 3 | 33 | 36 | 1.200 | 0.1812 | 0.1812 |
| 2022-23 | Orono High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 7 | 22 | 29 | 0.967 | 0.1460 | 0.1460 |
| 2023-24 | Orono High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 0.667 | 0.1007 | 0.1007 |
| 2024-25 | Orono High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 3 | 28 | 31 | 1.033 | 0.1560 | 0.1560 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Harvard | ECAC-W | FR | 23 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.174 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mekenzie Steffen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG | 0.350 | Wisconsin |
| Lauren Boyle | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG | 0.486 | Ohio State |
| Kate Hallett | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.100 | Harvard |
| Katie Robinson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.129 | Minnesota |
| Izzy Bagi | 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG | 0.556 | Holy Cross |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Cook | 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG | 0.333 | Aurora | NCHA |
| Amber Meluzio | 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG | 0.464 | Elmira | UCHC |
| Shelby Evans | 2024-25 · 0.89 PPG | — | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Madison Nichols | 2017-18 · 0.84 PPG | 0.450 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Lauren Bolger | 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG | — | New England College | LittleEast |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.