IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bailey Gray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 27 4 8 12 0.444 0.0671 0.0671 — —
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 27 4 17 21 0.778 0.1174 0.1174 — —
2023-24 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 27 7 20 27 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
2024-25 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 27 5 14 19 0.704 0.1063 0.1063 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware D1 NEWHA FR 32 1 3 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Delaware
+6.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1988
Defenseman overall
#276
Defenseman born in 2006
#1498
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Jorde
Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Flaherty
North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cheyenne Harris
Union ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.