Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.444 | 0.0671 | 0.0671 |
| 2022-23 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 0.778 | 0.1174 | 0.1174 |
| 2023-24 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 7 | 20 | 27 | 1.000 | 0.1510 | 0.1510 |
| 2024-25 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.704 | 0.1063 | 0.1063 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Delaware | NEWHA | FR | 32 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.125 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Briana Jorde | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG | 0.077 | Bemidji State |
| Taylor Flaherty | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.000 | North Dakota |
| Cheyenne Harris | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.324 | Union |
| Taylor Turnquist | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.171 | Clarkson |
| Allison Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG | 0.000 | Quinnipiac |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Patnode | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | — | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Jess Eykyn | 2023-24 · 1.88 PPG | 0.136 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Allie LeClaire | 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Lucy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Maddy Skogman | 2023-24 · 0.90 PPG | 0.280 | Concordia | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.