IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mackenzie Clarke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-09-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nepean Wildcats OWHL-U22 30 0 7 7 0.233 0.0816 0.0816 — —
2022-23 Ottawa Senators U22 OWHL-U22 39 1 11 12 0.308 0.1076 0.1076 — —
2024-25 Ottawa Senators U22 OWHL-U22 37 3 9 12 0.324 0.1134 0.1134 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W — 35 0 3 3 0.086
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W — 37 0 2 2 0.054
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2023-24 · St. Lawrence
-41.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2678
Defenseman overall
#329
Defenseman born in 2005
#537
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emma Turbyville
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Briana Jorde
Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Flaherty
North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.