IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Bernardy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 50 3 13 16 0.320 0.1137 0.1110 0.3360 0.3280
2006-07 Langley Rivermen BCHL 35 7 20 27 0.771 0.2972 0.2742 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 3 12 15 0.536
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 — JR 31 8 12 20 0.645
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 — SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 — FR 21 3 5 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2007-08 · St. Norbert
+93.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5525
Defenseman overall
#823
Defenseman born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Albert
Endicott · 2018-19
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Brainin
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Zack
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.