IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Albert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Northern Cyclones NCDC 44 10 16 26 0.591 0.2409 0.2377 0.4750 0.4687
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE SR 6 1 2 3 0.500
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE JR 21 3 3 6 0.286
2020-21 Endicott D1 CNE SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Endicott D1 CNE FR 18 7 3 10 0.556
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE FR 18 7 3 10 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2019-20 · Endicott
+173.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11396
Forward overall
#506
Forward born in 1999
#333
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Coykendall
Adrian · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Prattson
Trinity · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.