IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Lamirande Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Calgary Royals AJHL 62 22 31 53 0.855 0.2867 0.3066 0.7910 0.8459
2003-04 Calgary Royals AJHL 46 21 20 41 0.891 0.2989 0.3039 0.8248 0.8387
2004-05 Calgary Royals AJHL 63 27 50 77 1.222 0.4099 0.3973 1.1310 1.0962
2005-06 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 59 31 28 59 1.000 0.3354 0.3092 0.9254 0.8530
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 21 3 5 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2006-07 · Wisconsin-Superior
+29.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12403
Forward overall
#393
Forward born in 1985
#173
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Prappas
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Carpenter
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.