← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Maras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 13 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450
2020-21 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 7 9 16 0.762 0.1150 0.1150
2021-22 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 12 13 25 0.962 0.1452 0.1452
2022-23 Alexandria Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 15 22 37 1.370 0.2069 0.2069
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA SO 31 4 5 9 0.290
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D3 NEWHA SO 27 4 5 9 0.333
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 30 4 11 15 0.500
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D3 NEWHA FR 23 4 8 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Franklin Pierce
+220.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4615
Forward overall
#185
Forward born in 2005
#834
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.