IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brynn Puppe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 2 11 13 0.542 0.0818 0.0818 — —
2013-14 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 6 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087 — —
2014-15 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 10 8 18 0.750 0.1132 0.1132 — —
2015-16 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 12 23 0.920 0.1389 0.1389 — —
2016-17 Northfield High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 23 15 38 1.520 0.2295 0.2295 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Williams D3 NESCAC — 22 4 7 11 0.500
2019-20 Williams D3 NESCAC — 22 3 7 10 0.455
2018-19 Williams D3 NESCAC — 28 8 9 17 0.607
2017-18 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 25 8 6 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2017-18 · Williams
+207.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1087
Defenseman overall
#753
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Christa Vuglar
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emma Holmes
Suffolk · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Erin Meyers
Saint Anselm · 2016-17
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adriana Urban
Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.