← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-01 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Luleå HF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Chicago Steel USHL 60 23 38 61 1.017 0.6250 0.6005 2.9954 2.8778
2016-17 Jokerit KHL 55 16 20 36 0.654 1.6362 1.5285
2017-18 Jokerit KHL 44 14 16 30 0.682 1.7045 1.5195
2018-19 Jokerit KHL 62 13 45 58 0.935 2.3388 1.9813
2019-20 Jokerit KHL 56 19 29 48 0.857 2.1427 2.1427
2020-21 Jokerit KHL 53 12 42 54 1.019 2.5473 2.5473
2021-22 Jokerit KHL 41 9 33 42 1.024 2.5610 1.7490
2024-25 Luleå HF SHL 51 13 25 38 0.745 1.8627 0.9503
2025-26 Luleå HF SHL 50 11 25 36 0.720 1.8000 1.8000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Yale D1 ECAC SR 35 21 25 46 1.314
2010-11 Yale D1 ECAC JR 36 20 26 46 1.278
2009-10 Yale D1 ECAC SO 34 16 29 45 1.323
2008-09 Yale D1 ECAC FR 33 12 14 26 0.788
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.56
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2008-09 · Yale
+40.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#104
Forward overall
#1
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.