IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kory Falite Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Boston Jr. Bruins EJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1482 0.1635 — —
2003-04 Boston Jr. Bruins EJHL 36 11 9 20 0.556 0.1646 0.1764 — —
2004-05 Boston Jr. Bruins EJHL 53 17 21 38 0.717 0.2124 0.2178 — —
2005-06 Boston Jr. Bruins EJHL 44 21 34 55 1.250 0.3704 0.3621 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 39 18 16 34 0.872
2008-09 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 31 14 8 22 0.710
2007-08 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 37 18 14 32 0.865
2006-07 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 34 10 8 18 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2006-07 · UMass Lowell
+103.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18391
Forward overall
#625
Forward born in 1986
#77
in EJHL

D1 Comparables

Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.