← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Lisowsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-13 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 7, Pick #218  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Saskatoon Blades WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Saskatoon Blades WHL 24 8 9 17 0.708 0.3446 0.3446 1.7355 1.7355
2021-22 Saskatoon Blades WHL 68 33 25 58 0.853 0.4149 0.4322 2.0899 2.1772
2022-23 Saskatoon Blades WHL 65 38 33 71 1.092 0.5314 0.5288 2.6765 2.6633
2023-24 Saskatoon Blades WHL 68 42 38 80 1.177 0.5724 0.5414 2.8828 2.7266
2024-25 Victoria Royals WHL 61 40 34 74 1.213 0.5902 0.5267 2.9725 2.6526
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colorado College D1 NCHC FR 31 7 8 15 0.484
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2025-26 · Colorado College
-2.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4240
Forward overall
#101
Forward born in 2004
#83
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.