← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-04 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 11 1 0 1 0.091 0.0442 0.0442 0.2227 0.2227
2021-22 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 48 9 7 16 0.333 0.1622 0.1756 0.8167 0.8840
2022-23 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 61 10 9 19 0.311 0.1515 0.1569 0.7633 0.7906
2023-24 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 67 9 11 20 0.298 0.1452 0.1432 0.7314 0.7215
2024-25 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 68 18 15 33 0.485 0.2361 0.2203 1.1891 1.1095
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA 26 2 2 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2025-26 · Canisius
-5.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30104
Forward overall
#1768
Forward born in 2005
#1527
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.