← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Weber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-10-28 Country: USA
2007 · Round 2, Pick #53  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
Signed Professionally
Schwenninger Wild Wings · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Chicago Steel USHL 46 8 10 18 0.391 0.2308 0.2264 1.1752 1.1530
2018-19 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 43 3 11 14 0.326 0.8140 0.7624 2.7605 2.5854
2019-20 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 33 2 2 4 0.121 0.3030 0.3030 1.0276 1.0276
2020-21 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 35 0 5 5 0.143 0.3573 0.3573 1.2115 1.2115
2021-22 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 46 1 4 5 0.109 0.2717 0.2057 0.9216 0.6978
2022-23 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 49 1 4 5 0.102 0.2550 0.1856 0.8648 0.6293
2023-24 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 46 2 2 4 0.087 0.2175 0.1471 0.7376 0.4989
2024-25 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 48 1 2 3 0.062 0.1562 0.0985 0.5299 0.3341
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SR 40 0 4 4 0.100
2010-11 Miami D1 CCHA-orig JR 33 1 10 11 0.333
2009-10 Miami D1 NCHC SO 43 1 9 10 0.233
2008-09 Miami D1 NCHC FR 38 3 2 5 0.132
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2008-09 · Miami
-38.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19288
Defenseman overall
#1666
Defenseman born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2024-25
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.