← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominik Rymon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-29 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HC Energie Karlovy Vary U20 USHL-Style-Czech 9 4 5 9 1.000 0.3145 0.3145 1.1005 1.1005
2021-22 HC Energie Karlovy Vary U20 USHL-Style-Czech 37 27 19 46 1.243 0.3910 0.4072 1.3681 1.4248
2022-23 Everett Silvertips WHL 18 2 9 11 0.611 0.2973 0.2977 1.4974 1.4994
2023-24 Everett Silvertips WHL 57 34 47 81 1.421 0.6914 0.6583 3.4821 3.3154
2024-25 Everett Silvertips WHL 65 30 36 66 1.015 0.4940 0.4440 2.4880 2.2360
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 36 11 11 22 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2025-26 · Bowling Green
+23.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5226
Forward overall
#149
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.