IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaxon Jacobson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-12-11 Country: Canada
Top 27 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 7 4 2 6 0.857 0.4170 0.4916 2.0936 2.4682
2024-25 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 51 15 29 44 0.863 0.4197 0.4724 2.1073 2.3718
2025-26 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 63 25 60 85 1.349 0.6564 0.7084 3.2957 3.5568
2026-27 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 7 2 3 5 0.714 0.3475 0.3475 1.7448 1.7448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4692
Forward overall
#27
Forward born in 2008
#89
in WHL

D1 Comparables

C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jake Jackson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Bella
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.