IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kalle Kossila Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-14 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Örebro HK · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 EHC München DEL 13 5 7 12 0.923 2.3077 2.3077 7.8262 7.8262
2021-22 Jokerit KHL 39 7 14 21 0.538 1.3462 1.2470 7.4198 6.8733
2022-23 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 28 11 14 25 0.893 2.2323 1.9569 11.6511 10.2135
2023-24 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 40 12 22 34 0.850 2.1250 1.7257 11.0913 9.0073
2024-25 Örebro HK SHL 37 10 19 29 0.784 1.9595 1.4766 10.2275 7.7069
2025-26 Örebro HK SHL 43 11 23 34 0.791 1.9768 1.9768 10.3175 10.3175
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 41 14 40 54 1.317
2014-15 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 39 6 20 26 0.667
2013-14 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 38 13 27 40 1.053
2012-13 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig FR 39 15 18 33 0.846

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 27 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#102
Forward overall
#11
Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.