Kalle Kossila Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-14 Country: Finland

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2020-21	EHC München	DEL	13	5	7	12	0.923	1.0095	1.0095	—	—
2021-22	Jokerit	KHL	39	7	14	21	0.538	1.3462	1.2470	—	—
2022-23	Växjö Lakers HC	SHL	28	11	14	25	0.893	2.2323	1.9569	—	—
2023-24	Växjö Lakers HC	SHL	40	12	22	34	0.850	2.1250	1.7257	—	—
2024-25	Örebro HK	SHL	37	10	19	29	0.784	1.9595	1.4766	—	—
2025-26	Örebro HK	SHL	43	11	23	34	0.791	1.9768	1.9768	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2015-16	St. Cloud State	D1	NCHC	SR	41	14	40	54	1.317
2014-15	St. Cloud State	D1	NCHC	JR	39	6	20	26	0.667
2013-14	St. Cloud State	D1	NCHC	SO	38	13	27	40	1.053
2012-13	St. Cloud State	D1	WCHA-orig	FR	39	15	18	33	0.846

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.