← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beckett Hamilton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Red Deer Rebels WHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Red Deer Rebels WHL 67 14 11 25 0.373 0.1814 0.1978 0.9107 0.9928
2025-26 Red Deer Rebels WHL 67 24 38 62 0.925 0.4499 0.4697 2.2587 2.3579
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8033
Forward overall
#115
Forward born in 2008
#689
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.