← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kayden Stroeder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-03-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 16 5 3 8 0.500 0.2432 0.2764 1.2268 1.3942
2025-26 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 55 13 19 32 0.582 0.2830 0.3085 1.4276 1.5563
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19559
Forward overall
#64
Forward born in 2009
#716
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2021-22
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.