icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.320 | 0.0483 | 0.0486 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.480 | 0.0725 | 0.0699 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.360 | 0.0544 | 0.0504 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | RPI | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 36 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.278 |
| 2015-16 | RPI | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 34 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.324 |
| 2014-15 | RPI | D1 | — | — | 33 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.152 |
| 2013-14 | RPI | D1 | — | — | 27 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.074 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.