IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kirill Gotovets Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-06-25 Country: Belarus
2009 · Round 6, Pick #183  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
Signed Professionally
Dynamo Moskva · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Dinamo Minsk KHL 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.6250 0.6796 3.4447 3.7457
2018-19 Dinamo Minsk KHL 44 0 3 3 0.068 0.1705 0.1706 0.9397 0.9400
2019-20 Dinamo Minsk KHL 61 1 8 9 0.147 0.3687 0.3687 2.0324 2.0324
2020-21 Avangard Omsk KHL 45 1 1 2 0.044 0.1110 0.1110 0.6118 0.6118
2021-22 Avangard Omsk KHL 42 0 6 6 0.143 0.3573 0.2987 1.9690 1.6463
2022-23 Dynamo Moskva KHL 59 5 4 9 0.152 0.3812 0.2881 2.1013 1.5883
2023-24 Dynamo Moskva KHL 48 0 5 5 0.104 0.2605 0.1823 1.4357 1.0049
2024-25 Dynamo Moskva KHL 59 1 14 15 0.254 0.6355 0.4260 3.5025 2.3481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 32 1 3 4 0.125
2012-13 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 22 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 24 1 7 8 0.333
2010-11 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 34 1 6 7 0.206

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1424
Defenseman overall
#298
Defenseman born in 1991
#1217
in KHL

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.