← New Search ↗ Social Card

Crew Martinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Tri-City Americans WHL 43 10 13 23 0.535 0.2602 0.2858 1.3125 1.4416
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20248
Forward overall
#67
Forward born in 2009
#732
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.