IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cullen Munson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.3184 0.3482 1.4984 1.6387
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 59 11 17 28 0.475 0.1762 0.1815 0.5025 0.5175
2015-16 Janesville Jets NAHL 60 12 18 30 0.500 0.1857 0.1830 0.5294 0.5217
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 56 20 35 55 0.982 0.3647 0.3396 1.0398 0.9682
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 31 2 7 9 0.290
2019-20 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 16 2 0 2 0.125
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13239
Forward overall
#520
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cooper Board
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.