← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli McKamey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-19 Country: Canada
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 15 16 31 0.596 0.2297 0.2670 0.8671 1.0078
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 48 6 11 17 0.354 0.1723 0.1869 0.8652 0.9384
2026-27 Tri-City Americans WHL 5 1 3 4 0.800 0.3892 0.3892 1.9542 1.9542
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29933
Forward overall
#154
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
1.08
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHS-MN 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2013-14
0.37
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
WHL 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.