IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli McKamey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-19 Country: Canada
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 15 16 31 0.596 0.2297 0.2670 0.8676 1.0083
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 48 6 11 17 0.354 0.1723 0.1869 0.8691 0.9426
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29527
Forward overall
#121
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared Fiegl
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jackson Blake
USHS-MN 2019-20
1.08
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Tyler Young
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Cooper Moore
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.24
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Jack Kernan
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.58
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2006-07
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Dollimer
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.