← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Simpson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-05 Country: USA
2025 · Round 3, Pick #79  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Shakopee USHS-MN 26 24 12 36 1.385 0.1753 0.1753 0.3363 0.3363
2022-23 Shakopee USHS-MN 27 37 26 63 2.333 0.2954 0.2954 0.5668 0.5668
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 31 7 6 13 0.419 0.2474 0.2693 1.2596 1.3713
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 9 7 1 8 0.889 0.5244 0.5442 2.6697 2.7703
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 61 34 40 74 1.213 0.7156 0.7080 3.6434 3.6047
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3706
Forward overall
#28
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2021-22
0.41
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2024-25
0.89
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
BCHL 2015-16
0.50
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.