| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Baie-Comeau Drakkar | QMJHL | 67 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.060 | 0.0293 | 0.0308 | 0.1594 | 0.1676 |
| 2001-02 | Baie-Comeau Drakkar | QMJHL | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Carleton Univ. | USports-M | 19 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.105 | 0.0556 | 0.0422 | 0.3086 | 0.2345 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | SUNY Geneseo | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.