← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexandre Blais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-06-23 Country: Canada
2024 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #100  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0829 0.0924 0.4446 0.4953
2003-04 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 67 30 27 57 0.851 0.4232 0.4479 2.2688 2.4014
2004-05 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 66 13 31 44 0.667 0.3317 0.3349 1.7781 1.7952
2005-06 QMJHL 54 15 23 38 0.704 0.3501 0.3357 1.8768 1.7994
2006-07 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 58 35 48 83 1.431 0.4800 0.4472 1.3263 1.2357
2007-08 St. Francis Xavier Univ. usports 17 2 5 7 0.412
2008-09 Univ. of Québec-Trois-Rivières usports 10 3 8 11 1.100
2009-10 Univ. of Québec-Trois-Rivières usports 24 11 9 20 0.833
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast 38 6 13 19 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · UConn
+45.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8697
Forward overall
#308
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2017-18
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.