IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Winkler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-22 Country: Norway
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 10 26 36 0.654 0.4023 0.4033 1.9283 1.9329
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig — 42 13 15 28 0.667
2011-12 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig — 31 7 17 24 0.774
2010-11 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig — 26 3 6 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2010-11 · Colorado College
0.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8716
Forward overall
#363
Forward born in 1990
#762
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cam Darcy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Randolph
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Fox
Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.