IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Pryor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-09-06 Country: USA
2008 · Round 7, Pick #208  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 37 1 3 4 0.108 0.0397 0.0454 0.1141 0.1304
2007-08 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 41 3 9 12 0.293 0.2176 0.2167 1.0922 1.0879
2008-09 — USHL 43 7 17 24 0.558 0.3292 0.3388 1.6762 1.7251
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2011-12 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 36 2 11 13 0.361
2010-11 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 5 0 2 2 0.400
2009-10 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4818
Defenseman overall
#853
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Bella
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Hepler
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.