← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Lavin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-07-17 Country: USA
2007 · Round 4, Pick #126  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 31 5 3 8 0.258 0.1918 0.1983 0.9631 0.9956
2006-07 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 23 1 0 1 0.043 0.0323 0.0322 0.1623 0.1616
2008-09 Omaha Lancers USHL 33 7 15 22 0.667 0.3933 0.3824 2.0024 1.9468
2009-10 Omaha Lancers USHL 24 5 12 17 0.708 0.4178 0.3795 2.1273 1.9321
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig SR 44 6 11 17 0.386
2009-10 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 18 3 7 10 0.556
2008-09 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 12 0 1 1 0.083
2007-08 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 36 0 8 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2007-08 · Providence
+138.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2611
Defenseman overall
#461
Defenseman born in 1989

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.