IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Libby Miner

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Greenwich Academy NE-Prep-Girls 26 8 8 16 0.620 0.3847 0.3847 — —
2007-08 Greenwich Academy NE-Prep-Girls 21 9 6 15 0.710 0.4406 0.4406 — —
2008-09 Greenwich Academy NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 3 3 0.130 0.0807 0.0807 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2010-11 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4168
Forward overall
#267
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Taylor Heise
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Laura Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Smith
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie McMillan
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexis Larsen
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Leah Elledge
Lindenwood · 2012-13
0.032 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Timary Malley
Hamilton · 2011-12
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.