IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timary Malley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 12 7 8 15 1.250 0.7756 0.7756 — —
2012-13 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 23 10 7 17 0.740 0.4592 0.4592 — —
2013-14 Worcester Academy USHS-W 28 8 14 22 0.786 0.2363 0.2363 — —
2014-15 Worcester Academy USHS-W 25 2 11 13 0.520 0.1564 0.1564 — —
2015-16 Worcester Academy USHS-W 28 5 12 17 0.607 0.1826 0.1826 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 23 2 4 6 0.261
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 21 1 1 2 0.095
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 18 0 1 1 0.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2016-17 · Hamilton
-65.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#888
Defenseman overall

D1 Comparables

Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sadie Long
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Courtney Moriarty
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Roach
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.