| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Alpena IceDiggers | NAHL | 58 | 24 | 27 | 51 | 0.879 | 0.3231 | 0.3322 | 0.9281 | 0.9541 |
| 2008-09 | Lincoln Stars | USHL | 30 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.400 | 0.2360 | 0.2274 | 1.2014 | 1.1575 |
| 2009-10 | — | USHL | 44 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.477 | 0.2816 | 0.2533 | 1.4335 | 1.2894 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | American International | D1 | AHA | SR | 36 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 0.972 |
| 2012-13 | American International | D1 | AHA | JR | 34 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 0.706 |
| 2011-12 | American International | D1 | AHA | SO | 30 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 0.600 |
| 2010-11 | American International | D1 | AHA | FR | 31 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 0.613 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.