← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Puskar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 58 24 27 51 0.879 0.3231 0.3322 0.9281 0.9541
2008-09 Lincoln Stars USHL 30 7 5 12 0.400 0.2360 0.2274 1.2014 1.1575
2009-10 USHL 44 11 10 21 0.477 0.2816 0.2533 1.4335 1.2894
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 American International D1 AHA SR 36 17 18 35 0.972
2012-13 American International D1 AHA JR 34 12 12 24 0.706
2011-12 American International D1 AHA SO 30 7 11 18 0.600
2010-11 American International D1 AHA FR 31 12 7 19 0.613
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2010-11 · American International
+194.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13985
Forward overall
#489
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2018-19
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2007-08
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.