IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michaela Igo

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 23 14 9 23 1.000 0.6205 0.6205 — —
2011-12 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 27 16 10 26 0.960 0.5957 0.5957 — —
2012-13 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 25 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 10 1 0 1 0.100
2015-16 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 9 1 3 4 0.444
2014-15 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 12 5 3 8 0.667
2013-14 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 8 1 3 4 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.56
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · Connecticut College
-11.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3028
Forward overall
#212
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gracyn Knowles
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Baylee Darling
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brynn Puppe
Williams · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.