← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonas Schwarz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-10 Country: Germany
Top 29 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect  (Intl)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Lukko U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 13 1 8 9 0.692 0.3752 0.4232 1.0470 1.1809
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10613
Forward overall
#29
Forward born in 2009
#282
in SM-Liiga-Jr

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.