IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luukas Kokkonen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-07-25 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 KalPa U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 7 0 4 4 0.571 0.3097 0.3538 0.8641 0.9872
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Dylan Larkin
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Michigan (1.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Anders Bjork
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Wilkie
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gambrell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (1.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Cannizzaro
Hobart · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2013-14
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2012-13
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.