IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Cannizzaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1397 0.1590 0.3451 0.3929
2004-05 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 48 16 32 48 1.000 0.2794 0.3040 0.6901 0.7508
2005-06 Rochester Stars EJHL 18 8 11 19 1.056 0.3128 0.3333 — —
2006-07 Brockville Braves CCHL 27 9 14 23 0.852 0.2431 0.2456 0.6595 0.6663
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Hobart D3 — FR 22 11 11 22 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2009-10 · Hobart
+316.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12471
Forward overall
#565
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Tyler Ledford
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Air Force (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alec Butcher
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Andrew McDonald
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Bentley (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Kernan
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hodd-Chlebeck
Saint John's · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Arcan
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.