| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 10 | 0 | 0 | 93.3% | 2.32 | 2 | 0.9843 | 94.7% |
| 2025-26 | Muskegon Lumberjacks | USHL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 87.5% | 3.51 | 0 | 0.9983 | 87.3% |
| 2024-25 | — | BCHL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 87.9% | 4.00 | 0 | 0.9990 | 92.6% |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Smith | NAHL | 92.8% | 94.3% | Princeton | 89.9% | 2.96 |
| Carsen Musser | USHL | 90.5% | 90.5% | Colorado College | 87.9% | 3.94 |
| Hampton Slukynsky | USHL | 92.3% | 92.8% | Western Michigan | 92.2% | 1.90 |
| Mikhail Yegorov | USHL | 91.2% | 90.5% | Boston University | 90.4% | 2.73 |
| Mathis Langevin | QMJHL | 91.2% | 91.3% | Miami | 93.8% | 2.00 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brody Haynes | NCDC | 92.5% | 92.3% | Elmira | D3 | 94.8% | 1.22 |
| Vaughn Makar | NAHL | 90.9% | 94.0% | St. Norbert | D3 | 93.2% | 1.73 |
| Cooper Rautenstrauch | NAHL | 88.9% | 92.2% | Colby | D3 | 93.4% | 2.08 |
| Cooper Rautenstrauch | NCDC | 90.6% | 92.2% | Colby | D3 | 93.4% | 2.08 |
| Brayden Ingram | EHL | 91.2% | 92.3% | Assumption | D2 | 91.4% | 2.71 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.