← New Search ↗ Social Card

Russ Decoste Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2005-04-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 USPHL-Premier 23 13 7 93.1% 2.02 3 0.9400 85.9%
2023-24 NOJHL 27 17 8 91.7% 2.74 3 0.9700 90.0%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Westfield State D3 5 93.3% 2.38
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Noah Grannan USHL 89.1% 85.8% Penn State 88.5% 3.40
Adam Gajan USHL 89.3% 85.9% Minnesota Duluth 88.5% 3.33
Samuel Urban USHL 89.9% 86.4% Arizona State 90.4% 3.53
Jaxson Stauber USHL 88.3% 85.0% Minnesota 93.3% 1.00
Axel Mangbo USHL 89.0% 85.4% Vermont 85.7% 5.00
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jackson Fellner SJHL 89.9% 86.4% Alvernia D3 92.4% 2.68
Carson Ironside AJHL 87.8% 86.2% Albertus Magnus D3 89.3% 2.76
Andrew Doran NA3HL 93.4% 87.0% Utica D3 100.0%
Clément Labillois SJHL 88.9% 85.2% Assumption D2 93.6% 2.08
Tyler Fromolz NA3HL 92.0% 86.3% Marian D3 88.3% 3.85

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.