← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Rye Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2006-10-28 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bentley
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2025-26 Peterborough Petes OHL 57 38 16 91.5% 2.78 3 1.0008 89.7%
2024-25 Peterborough Petes OHL 29 10 14 90.2% 3.67 0 1.0008 91.8%
2023-24 North Bay Battalion OHL 9 1 4 84.1% 6.19 0 1.0008 88.8%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Aiden Wright USHL 90.6% 88.7% Vermont 89.2% 3.10
Carson Cherepak MJHL 92.1% 89.2% RPI 89.6% 3.11
Ashton Abel AJHL 90.9% 87.6% Boston University 89.1% 3.15
Nils Wallström NAHL 91.9% 91.6% American International 92.0% 2.27
Louden Hogg USHL 89.4% 87.6% Holy Cross 87.3% 3.29
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Justin Damon USPHL-Premier 94.0% 91.2% Gustavus Adolphus D3 92.9% 2.27
Nevin Tardif USPHL-Premier 90.4% 87.8% Worcester State D3 89.8% 3.54
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22
Connor Carbo EHL 89.3% 89.2% Wentworth D3 92.3% 3.00
Brayden Ingram EHL 91.2% 92.3% Assumption D2 91.4% 2.71

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.