← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Towle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2006-03-27 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2025-26 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 29 12 8 91.4% 2.65 1 0.9938 87.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Bryant Marks NAHL 89.7% 87.6% Alaska Anchorage 94.1% 1.33
Ryan Manzella NAHL 90.4% 88.3% Michigan Tech 90.6% 2.48
Kolby Matthews BCHL 90.0% 87.5% RIT 93.3% 1.69
Marcus Brännman USHL 90.3% 86.6% Providence 75.0% 4.01
Francis Boisvert CCHL 92.0% 86.9% St. Lawrence 89.7% 3.50
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Cal Wilcox NCDC 89.6% 87.9% Suffolk D3 89.1% 4.18
Chad Lowe USPHL-Premier 93.5% 88.6% SUNY Morrisville D3 90.2% 4.99
Chad Lowe USPHL-Premier 93.5% 88.6% Morrisville D3 90.2% 4.99
Jackson Fellner SJHL 89.9% 86.4% Alvernia D3 92.4% 2.68
Carson Ironside AJHL 87.8% 86.2% Albertus Magnus D3 89.3% 2.76

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.