IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Lind Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-03-31 Country: USA
2010 · Round 6, Pick #177  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Chicago Steel USHL 50 2 3 5 0.100 0.0590 0.0653 0.3003 0.3326
2009-10 Chicago Steel USHL 55 6 10 16 0.291 0.1716 0.1791 0.8737 0.9117
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 40 3 7 10 0.250
2012-13 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig JR 40 2 3 5 0.125
2011-12 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig SO 39 1 2 3 0.077
2010-11 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig FR 32 1 10 11 0.344
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2010-11 · Notre Dame
+172.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12924
Defenseman overall
#1538
Defenseman born in 1992
#3525
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Ausmus
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2000-01
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2007-08
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.