IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Fiume Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 44 16 23 39 0.886 0.2477 0.2552 0.6117 0.6302
2001-02 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 9 5 5 10 1.111 0.3104 0.3038 0.7668 0.7504
2002-03 Aurora Tigers OJHL 27 9 13 22 0.815 0.2277 0.2134 0.5623 0.5270
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Buffalo State D3 — JR 8 1 4 5 0.625
2004-05 Neumann D3 — SO 23 6 3 9 0.391
2003-04 Neumann D3 — FR 25 7 19 26 1.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2003-04 · Neumann
+386.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16097
Forward overall
#581
Forward born in 1983
#1041
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Drabin
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2003-04
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Zizek
SUNY Oswego · 2014-15
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.