icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | El Paso Rhinos | NAHL | 31 | 21 | 6 | 93.9% | 2.05 | 2 | 0.9843 | 90.4% |
| 2024-25 | — | NCDC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 89.2% | 4.00 | 0 | 0.9400 | 85.2% |
| 2024-25 | — | CCHL | 35 | 21 | 13 | 92.2% | 2.50 | 3 | 0.9700 | 89.6% |
| 2023-24 | — | NCDC | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9400 | — |
| 2022-23 | — | NAHL | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.9843 | — |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter McPhail | NAHL | 93.1% | 89.6% | Ferris State | 88.6% | 3.74 |
| Tomas Anderson | NAHL | 93.7% | 89.8% | Niagara | 89.0% | 3.20 |
| John Roberts | NAHL | 92.5% | 89.0% | Northern Michigan | 100.0% | — |
| Callum Tung | BCHL | 91.7% | 88.5% | UConn | 93.3% | 2.01 |
| Lassi Lehti | NAHL | 92.0% | 88.7% | Alaska Fairbanks | 83.3% | 5.56 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Albano | OJHL | 91.7% | 89.9% | Norwich | D3 | 82.4% | 3.00 |
| Stefan Carney | NCDC | 93.3% | 90.7% | University of New England | D3 | 92.6% | 1.83 |
| Devon Bobak | NAHL | 92.1% | 91.1% | Trinity | D3 | 93.4% | 1.41 |
| Peter Sterling | NAHL | 90.7% | 89.9% | Endicott | D3 | 93.3% | 1.63 |
| Ryan Henry | NCDC | 91.6% | 89.5% | Nichols | D3 | 92.9% | 2.39 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.