← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tomas Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 NAHL 45 37 6 93.7% 1.53 8 0.9843 87.7%
2023-24 MJHL 36 25 8 93.1% 2.10 7 0.9700 90.2%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Niagara D1 16 4 9 89.0% 3.20 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Klayton Knapp NAHL 92.1% 86.5% Minnesota Duluth 90.7% 2.67
Croix Kochendorfer NAHL 92.0% 86.6% Robert Morris 90.6% 2.95
Carson Dorfman NAHL 90.1% 84.7% RPI 100.0%
Carter McPhail NAHL 93.1% 87.8% Ferris State 88.6% 3.74
Brandon Perrone NAHL 91.2% 85.4% Alaska Anchorage 87.2% 3.66
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Lochlan Lauer EHL 91.1% 87.6% Lebanon Valley D3 93.3% 2.24
Dylan Gorman EHL 90.7% 87.2% Manhattanville D3
Selby Warren NAHL 90.9% 87.8% Salve Regina D3 92.9% 2.18
Damon Beaver NAHL 91.4% 87.6% Hobart D3 95.5% 1.04
Ben O'Keefe EHL 91.4% 88.0% Framingham State D3 89.0% 4.21

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.