IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Milberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2001-07-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2021-22 — NAHL 38 24 9 92.4% 2.30 7 0.9843 85.0%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 3 2 0 86.3% 3.89 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Quentin Sigurdson NAHL 92.3% 85.2% Northeastern 92.0% 2.13
Matt Ladd NAHL 92.2% 84.4% Canisius 86.8% 3.97
Beni Halasz NAHL 92.1% 85.2% Northern Michigan 91.9% 2.32
Gergely Orosz NAHL 91.9% 85.4% Alaska Anchorage 91.5% 2.75
Nick Bevilacqua NCDC 94.8% 83.4% Bentley 95.2% 0.99
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Max Macchioni USPHL-Premier 95.3% 85.1% Fitchburg State D3 92.2% 2.61
Max Macchioni NCDC 91.1% 84.7% Fitchburg State D3 92.2% 2.61
Nick Wiencek NCDC 91.8% 84.9% Lake Forest D3 94.4% 1.50
Antoine Robidoux-Hurtubise EHL 90.6% 85.3% Misericordia D3 84.5% 5.01
Dane Couture NAHL 88.1% 83.7% Concordia D3 87.3% 2.94

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.