IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Simpson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-02-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 London Knights OHL 48 34 10 90.5% 2.61 4 1.0008 83.1%
2022-23 — OHL 51 24 22 91.4% 2.73 5 1.0008 87.2%
2021-22 — OHL 45 20 18 89.1% 3.56 1 1.0008 87.8%
2020-21 — OHL — — — — — — 1.0008 —
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Providence D1 2 2 0 93.6% 1.52 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Jacob Zacharewicz NAHL 89.2% 83.4% Brown 86.8% 4.19
Luke Lush AJHL 91.9% 83.0% Sacred Heart 91.5% 2.11
Daniel Hauser WHL 91.3% 83.7% Wisconsin 90.0% 2.49
Thomas Heaney NAHL 90.0% 84.2% UConn 86.7% 4.39
Ryan Snowden USHL 89.8% 82.7% Ohio State 90.5% 2.52
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Nikolas Trakakis MJHL 87.9% 83.1% Chatham D3 93.4% 2.45
Blake Bjella USPHL-Premier 91.5% 83.1% Worcester State D3 87.0% 3.54
Graham Burke NAHL 86.2% 82.8% Hobart D3 95.1% 1.00
Anthony Bonaldi USPHL-Premier 90.6% 82.7% Nichols D3 81.8% 7.78
Josh Nadler AJHL 89.5% 84.2% Hamilton D3 68.8% 12.03

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.